27 Şubat 2012 Pazartesi

the Theory of Everything


The Theory of Everything

By Michio Kaku



Time Magazine chose him as Man of the Century. Albert Einstein had three great theories. His first theory of Special Relativity (1905) gave us E = mc², which led to the atomic bomb and unlocked the secret of the stars. His second great theory was General Relativity (1915), which gave us space curves, the Big Bang, and black holes. But many don't realize that his greatest theory was never finished: "a theory of everything". Einstein's crowning achievement was to have been the unified field theory, an attempt to "read the mind of God".



But on the third try, Einstein failed. He spent the last 30 years of his life chasing after an equation that would explain all physical phenomena. Everything from Creation to atoms and molecules, perhaps even DNA, people, and love was to be explained by this equation. If discovered, it was to have been the ultimate achievement of 2,000 years of investigation into the nature of space and matter, ever since the Greeks asked what was the smallest particle and the smallest unit of space. Although there are many unresolved questions, today the leading and, in fact, only candidate for the Theory of Everything is superstring theory, defined in 10 dimensional hyperspace. Superstring theory, in turn may one day answer some of the deepest questions of the universe, such as: What happened before the big bang? Is it possible to build a time machine? Can we punch a hole in space? Not only has the power of this theory startled the world of mathematics and shaken the world of physics, it is also the craziest theory ever proposed.

Four fundamental forces

Today, we realize that the entire universe is governed by four fundamental forces:

  • The gravitational force, which keeps us from flying into outer space, and prevents our sun (a gigantic hydrogen bomb) from exploding outward.
  • The electromagnetic force, which light up our cities and energizes our lasers and our computers.

  • The strong and weak nuclear forces, which lights up the stars and galaxies.

Gravity can be described by Einstein's general relativity theory. Matter warps the space surround it, thereby creating the "force" of gravity. Imagine an ant walking on a crumpled sheet of paper. The ant would say that there was a mysterious "force" which pulled it left and right. But we know that there is no "force" pulling the ant; there is only the crumpled sheet of paper pushing the ant left and right. Gravity does not pull: empty space  pushes.

But after decades physicists have unified these three quantum forces into what is called the Standard Model. Remarkably, all known physical phenomenon can, in principle, be described by these two great theories, relativity and the quantum theory. But why should nature, at the most fundamental level, create two totally dissimilar theories? Sadly, every attempt to merge these two theories has failed. Some of the greatest minds of the century have tackled this problem, only to be unsuccessful.

Superstring theory combines relativity and quantum in an elegant, intuitive way. First, it describes a great number  of quantum particles of nature because each particle represents a "note" on a vibrating string. Think of a violin string. No one says that A or B is more fundamental than C. What is fundamental is the string itself.

Superstring theory says that, if we had a supermicroscope and could peer at an electron, we would see a string vibrating in a certain mode. The string is extremely small (10 to the minus 33 centimeters!) so that the electron looks like a point particle to us. If we shake the string, so it vibrates in a different mode, then the electron can turn into something else, such as a quark, the fundamental constitute of protons and neutrons. Shake it again, and the string could vibrate in the mode which describes photons (the quanta of light). Shake it again and it turns into a graviton (the quanta of gravity).

The superstring theory can also explain gravity. When the superstring moves in space and time, splitting and rejoining into other strings, it forces the space-time surrounding it to curl up, just as Einstein's equations predict. In other words, even if Einstein never dreamed up general relativity, we might have discovered it through superstring theory.



Superstring theory, of course, has its detractors. Many  point out it predicts the universe is defined in 10 dimensional hyperspace, which sounds more like science fiction than real physics. It's indisputable that the universe exists in four dimensions (3 spatial dimensions and one time dimension). Every object in the universe, from the tip of your nose to the farthest star, can be located by giving just 3 co-ordinates (length, width, and height). If we also give the time, then we can describe every event in the universe with just four numbers. For example in New York, we might say to a friend, "meet me at 42nd street and 5th avenue, on the 25th floor, at 12:00." Thus, four numbers (42,5,25,12) completely specifies this event in space-time.

Superstring theory, however, predicts the universe should exist in 10 dimensions, not four. To explain where the other six dimensions went, physicists believe that the universe originally existed in 10 dimensions. However, at the instant of the Big Bang, for reasons we don't understand, six of the 10 dimensions "curled up" and collapsed, while the other four dimensions expanded rapidly. In some sense, our universe expanded at the expense of a twin universe which collapsed down to microscopic size.

1.    Which of the given words is closest to crowning in the first paragraph?

a.         highest      b. weakest       c. ancient        d. accessible

2.    Which of the given words is closest to startle in the second  paragraph

a.    upset      b. change     c. surprise      d. create

3.    Which of the sentences given below is true according to the text?

a. Of all his great achievements Einstein’s superstring theory was the best to explain the origin of the universe.

b. Greeks tried to answer the questions about the origin of the universe.

c. Einstein tried to find a formula that would explain all the facts in physics.

d. Einstein was crazy to propose the Theory of Everything.

4.    Which of these sentences is NOT true according to the text?

a.      All the theories which meant to solve the mysteries of the universe were unsuccessful to explain the combination of relativity and quantum theory.

b.      If shaken a string turns into something different such as quarks and photons.

c.       If Einstein had not introduced the gravity theory, it still would be possible that we would discover it thanks to string theory.

d.      Everything in the universe can be specified by the co-ordinates and time.

5.    What does it refer in the second paragraph?

a.      Reading the mind of God.

b.      Investigation into nature of space and matter

c.       An equation that would explain all physical phenomena

d.      Creation, atoms, molecules, Dna and love


Answers
1. a   2.c   3. c   4. a   5. c